It is our duty to question, probe and demand transparency, to ensure our leaders do not serve hidden agendas but the interests of the American people.
In the realm of politics, there is often a game of hidden agendas and secret alliances. One such player who seems to have slipped under the radar is Nikki Haley, the former South Carolina Governor and UN Ambassador. While she may try to present herself as a conservative champion, there are disturbing ties that connect her to the World Economic Forum (WEF), an organization known for its globalist agenda. Surprisingly, these ties have received very little scrutiny.
To understand the significance of Haley's connections, we must first examine Ramaswamy's experience with the WEF. A few years ago, the WEF reached out to Ramaswamy, inviting him to be included on their list of Young Global Leaders. Recognizing the organization's questionable agenda, Ramaswamy declined the offer, openly expressing his disagreement. However, despite his refusal, the WEF included his name anyway. This led Ramaswamy to take legal action, suing the WEF and demanding his removal from their list. In a surprising turn of events, the WEF ultimately capitulated, issuing a public apology, disavowing their actions, and promising to never name someone without explicit permission again.
The stark contrast between Ramaswamy's experience and Haley's involvement with the WEF is striking.
While Ramaswamy fought tooth and nail to distance himself from the globalist organization, Haley seems to have embraced her association with it. In 2011, the same year she became Governor of South Carolina, Haley was chosen as one of the WEF's Young Global Leaders. This distinction, celebrated in the Indian press, highlights her close ties to the organization and its founder, Klaus Schwab.
What makes Haley's relationship with the WEF even more concerning is the lack of media scrutiny surrounding it.
While Ramaswamy's every move has been dissected and criticized, Haley's connection to the globalist agenda has largely gone unnoticed. It begs the question: why are the media and donors so quick to support Haley and ignore her ties to the WEF?
Perhaps it is due to the fact that Haley presents herself as a more palatable candidate for the establishment. She has received endorsements from influential figures and media outlets, positioning herself as a viable contender against President Biden in a hypothetical 2024 match-up. However, this support must be questioned in light of her ties to the WEF.
Can we trust that Haley will truly represent the interests of the American people, or will she be swayed by the globalist agenda that the WEF promotes?
Haley's participation in a WEF event in China in 2007 raises additional concerns. At that time, China was touted as an emerging economic superpower, and the WEF's presence in the country was seen as significant. Haley's attendance raises questions about the nature of her relationship with the WEF and her stance on global economic issues.
While Ramaswamy has faced fierce criticism and scrutiny for alleged connections to the WEF, Nikki Haley's ties to the organization have largely gone under the radar. This discrepancy is concerning and raises doubts about Haley's true allegiance and the extent to which she may be influenced by the globalist agenda promoted by the WEF.
As voters, we must demand transparency and hold our candidates accountable for their associations and actions.
Only then can we ensure that our leaders truly represent the interests of the American people rather than being swayed by hidden agendas.
Please subscribe to this substack if you want to have similar content delivered directly to your inbox.